What are Employer's Best Practices when Conducting HR Investigations in Los Angeles?
Posted by Jacob I. Kiani | Dec 20, 2013 | 0 Comments
The top Employment attorneys in Los Angeles CA and around the country all regularly advise employers on personnel issues, including the conduct of internal investigations into employee complaints. For example, this firm provides legal representation to employers by routinely counseling human resources professionals in the conduct of investigations into internal complaints, including those involving discrimination, harassment and retaliation.
What are Employer's Best Practices when Conducting HR Investigations in Los Angeles?
Every HR professional should have a foundation of basic skills to use during the internal investigation. As the HR person becomes more experienced, the process becomes more comfortable even though each investigation is a unique event with idiosyncratic challenges.
A methodical and thoughtful process will be extremely valuable at each stage of the investigation and will result in a more reliable conclusion. The investigation that has such integrity will be easy to defend, if necessary, if an issue goes to litigation. Even more importantly, because so few investigations become part of litigation, the organization takes confidence in the process and employees understand their complaints will receive a fair internal review. Every employer should ensure that its internal investigators, usually human resources professionals, are competent in this area.
The following are the most common issues that regularly come up in our review and assistance of our clients with internal investigations and most common problems that arise and suggestions for best practices when conducting the investigations:
1. Define the scope of the investigation from the complainant. We suggest using an issue confirmation memo, which can be a simple e-mail, to the complainant that states what issues have been raised. In that way, the complainant and the HR professional are on the same page from the start of the investigation.
2. Prepare for the interviews. Preparation will allow the interviews to be more efficient and reduce the likelihood that a witness will need to be interviewed twice or that critical questions will not be asked. Take the time to plan the process and identify the issues needed to be covered with every witness.
3. Collect the facts. Focus on the basic facts; ask the 5 W's (Who, What, When, Where and Why). Listen and ask follow-up questions. Start your questioning by asking broad questions; do not focus too soon on the narrow questions that are directly pointed at the key issue.
4. Check the internal procedures and identify relevant policies. It can be very detrimental to the investigation process and the employer's ability to rely on the investigation as an attempt to do the right thing if the employer's internal procedures have not been followed. The HR professional must be aware of a policy, procedure or guideline that impacts the investigation process itself. Consequently, the policies should be known during the investigation and referenced in the investigation summary.
5. Make a decision. A good HR investigator is a neutral fact-finder and must remember to get at the facts without asking questions that imply a legal conclusion, such as “Do you feel that you were harassed?”
Face the facts: regardless of which way the HR professional finds in an investigation, someone will be unhappy. Weighing the evidence and reaching a factual conclusion is the purpose of the investigation. Inexperienced HR professionals sometimes are looking for the slam dunk video or the confession; unfortunately, those rarely appear.
The HR investigator has to become comfortable in the assessment of the facts to make a decision on what probably happened (preponderance of the evidence; the standard for public sector employers in California) or a reasonable conclusion after a good faith investigation (the standard for private employers in California).
6. Write an investigation summary. Far too often we ask to see the investigation file after litigation has begun and we find there are notes of witness interviews, but no investigation summary.
The report does not need to be especially lengthy, but it should address how the complaint came forward, the issues set forth by the complainant, the identity of the witnesses, the policies implicated, the facts collected, the conclusions regarding the issues raised and the rationale for reaching the factual conclusions.
7. Be thoughtful about the conclusions. The factual conclusions are the whole point of the investigation. The HR professional should be logical and methodical in explaining why a particular factual conclusion has been reached.
8. Explain any credibility resolution. Often the HR professional will state that one witness was more credible than another. Yet, the reasons for the credibility finding are not described. The experienced HR professional will rely on more than demeanor evidence to determine credibility.
Often the investigator will assess the logic of the acts, the consistency of conduct and the circumstantial and corroborating evidence to make a determination about the credibility of the witness. A short explanation of that analysis should be provided in the investigation summary.
9. Close the loop with the complainant. The accused has a privacy interest in any disciplinary action. The HR professional can explain that steps have been taken to ensure inappropriate conduct does not occur in the future, but specific discipline should not be shared with the complainant or witnesses. At the very least, it is important to let the complainant know that the organization has an express policy that prohibits retaliation and if conduct occurs that the complainant believes is retaliatory, the complainant should come forward.
10. End the investigation. Some inexperienced HR professionals want the perfect investigation. They are uncertain about whether “there is enough” to reach a conclusion. Consequently, the investigation continues for far too long. There is always another witness to interview or some other angle to explore. Experience provides confidence in arriving at a conclusion.
Los Angeles Family Law Practice Areas
Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer
Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.