The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) for the Department of Justice (DOJ) provided a Technical Assistance Letter (TAL)[1] to an immigration attorney who requested an advisory opinion on how her client should seek to comply with the requirements of section 274a of the INA (relating to not employing aliens who lack employment authorization) without violating 274b (prohibitions on discriminatory conduct in employment-related matters). The attorney sought guidance on how her client should proceed after an internal audit of its employees' Forms I-9 called into doubt the veracity of some of the employees' Forms I-551. The attorney was concerned that if her client requested alternative documentation from the employees in question, it would open itself up to a lawsuit under 274b. Her concerns were exacerbated by the fact that the employees in question shared a common national origin.

The TAL provided general advice for employers in similar situations. It listed the types of discriminatory employment-related conduct that are prohibited under 274b:
  1. citizenship or immigration status discrimination;
  2. national origin discrimination;
  3. unfair documentary practices during the employment eligibility verification (Form I-9 and E-Verify process) («document abuse»); and
  4. retaliation for filing a charge, assisting in an investigation, or asserting rights under the anti-discrimination provision.
The TAL then included general advice for complying with 274a without violating 274b:
  • Internal Form I-9 audits should treat similarly-situated employees in a similar manner and should not treat employees differently based on citizenship status or national origin.
  • The same level of scrutiny should be applied to all Forms I-9 without regard to citizenship or national origin.
  • Provided that the employer conducts the Form I-9 audit and the review in a consistent manner, requesting alternative documentation from certain employees whose documentation was found to be questionable is unlikely to violate 274b.
The TAL provides solid general advice to employers in similar situations. An employer with questions relating to 274a and 274b should always consult with an experienced immigration attorney.

Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.
  1. Published on AILA InfoNet at Doc. No. 15110262

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.